Impact of mobilization in patients with short-term mechanical circulatory support such as Levitronix® CentriMag as a bridge to heart transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the benefits of mobilisation in the critical patient, the evidence in patients with Levitronix® CentriMag as a bridge to heart transplantation (HT) is scarce. The objective of this study is to analyze the impact of mobility on these patients. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of patients who received a HT with Levitronix® CentriMag admitted between 2010 and 2019 to a tertiary hospital. Degree of mobility and nutritional status were assessed at the time of HT. Outcomes including infections, length of hospital admission and mortality were evaluated. RESULTS: 27 patients were included and divided in two groups according to degree of mobility (22 with low mobility and 5 with high mobility). 90-day survival after HT was 63.6% in patients with low mobility and 80% in high mobility group; no statistically significant differences were observed. No differences were observed regarding ICU discharge after HT at 30 days. Nevertheless, lower albumin levels were observed in low mobility group (24,5 g/L (IQR: 23-30) vs 33 g/L (IQR: 26-36); p = .029). Invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) post HT was longer in patients with low mobility (p = .014). There were no significant differences in appearance of pressure ulcers, or post HT infections among mobility groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with high mobility had a shorter time of IMV and a better nutritional status. No complications were observed associated to mobility. No differences were observed between the degree of mobility and 90-day mortality, ICU stay or post HT adverse events.

Discharge survival of patients undergoing ECMO therapy after ECPR in a third level hospital.

GOAL: The goal of this study was to assess the survival to hospital discharge in patients after the implementation of venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) during cardiopulmonary arrest (simultaneously or during the first six hours after the event) in a Spanish tertiary hospital. METHOD: This is a descriptive and retrospective study conducted with patients subjected to VA-ECMO therapy during or after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the last 10 years. The variables were extracted from the electronic medical record of each patient. RESULTS: 175 ECMO therapies were implemented, 84% (147) were VA-ECMO, and the indication for 17% (25) was CPR. In 40% (10), ECMO therapy was initiated simultaneously during CPR, and the rest (15) during the first six hours after the event. Survival rates reached 44%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of CPR in well-selected patients can improve their survival.

Supervivencia al alta hospitalaria de los pacientes sometidos a terapia ECMO tras PCR en un hospital de tercer nivel / Discharge survival of patients undergoing ECMO therapy after ECPR in a third level hospital

Objetivo El objetivo del estudio fue analizar la supervivencia al alta hospitalaria de los pacientes tras la instauración de una membrana de oxigenación extracorpórea veno-arterial (ECMO-VA) durante paro cardiorrespiratorio (simultáneamente o durante las 6 horas posteriores a este) en un hospital de tercer nivel español. Metodología Estudio descriptivo y retrospectivo de los pacientes sometidos a una terapia ECMO-VA durante o tras maniobras de reanimación cardiopulmonar (ERCP) en los últimos 10 años. Las variables fueron extraídas de la historia clínica electrónica de cada paciente. Resultados Se implantaron 175 ECMO, el 84% (147) fueron ECMO-VA y el 17% (25) su indicación fue de ECPR. El 40% (10) la terapia ECMO se inició simultáneamente durante las maniobras de RCP y el resto (15) en las 6 horas posteriores. Se obtuvieron tasas de supervivencia del 44%. Conclusiones El uso de la ERCP a pacientes bien seleccionados puede mejorar su supervivencia. (AU)

Goal The goal of this study was to assess the survival to hospital discharge in patients after the implementation of venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) during cardiopulmonary arrest (simultaneously or during the first six hours after the event) in a Spanish tertiary hospital. Method This is a descriptive and retrospective study conducted with patients subjected to VA-ECMO therapy during or after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in the last 10 years. The variables were extracted from the electronic medical record of each patient. Results 175 ECMO therapies were implemented, 84% (147) were VA-ECMO, and the indication for 17% (25) was ECPR. In 40% (10), ECMO therapy was initiated simultaneously during CPR, and the rest (15) during the first six hours after the event. Survival rates reached 44%. Conclusions The use of CPR in well-selected patients can improve their survival. (AU)

Discharge survival of patients undergoing ECMO therapy after ECPR in a third level hospital. / Supervivencia al alta hospitalaria de los pacientes sometidos a terapia ECMO tras PCR en un hospital de tercer nivel.

GOAL: The goal of this study was to assess the survival to hospital discharge in patients after the implementation of venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) during cardiopulmonary arrest (simultaneously or during the first six hours after the event) in a Spanish tertiary hospital. METHOD: This is a descriptive and retrospective study conducted with patients subjected to VA-ECMO therapy during or after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in the last 10 years. The variables were extracted from the electronic medical record of each patient. RESULTS: 175 ECMO therapies were implemented, 84% (147) were VA-ECMO, and the indication for 17% (25) was ECPR. In 40% (10), ECMO therapy was initiated simultaneously during CPR, and the rest (15) during the first six hours after the event. Survival rates reached 44%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of CPR in well-selected patients can improve their survival.

Comparative study on fixation of central venous catheter by suture versus adhesive device. / Estudio comparativo sobre fijación de catéter venoso central mediante sutura versus dispositivo adhesivo.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of a central venous catheter adhesive fixation device (CVC) to prevent associated complications. To establish the need for dressing changes, number of days' catheterization and reasons for catheter removal in both study groups. To assess the degree of satisfaction of personnel with the adhesive system. METHOD: A, randomized, prospective and open pilot study, of parallel groups, with comparative evaluation between CVC fixation with suture and with an adhesive safety system. The study was performed in the Coronary Unit of the Universitari de Bellvitge Hospital, between April and November 2016. The population studied were patients with a CVC. The results were analyzed using SPSS Statistics software. The study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee. RESULTS: 100 patients (47 adhesive system and 53 suture) were analyzed. Both groups were homogeneous in terms of demographic variables, anticoagulation and days of catheterization. The frequency of complications in the adhesive system group was 21.3%, while in the suture group it was 47.2% (P=.01). The suture group had a higher frequency of local signs of infection (p=.006), catheter displacement (p=.005), and catheter-associated bacteraemia (P=.05). The use of adhesive fixation was associated with a lower requirement for dressing changes due to bleeding (P=.006). Ninety-six point seven percent of the staff recommended using the adhesive safety system. CONCLUSIONS: The catheters fixed with adhesive systems had fewer infectious complications and less displacement.